Tests of two optimal incentive models for executive stock options

Files

RA_hdl_108283.pdf (558.16 KB)
  (Restricted Access)

Date

2011

Authors

Canil, J.
Rosser, B.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Corporate Ownership and Control, 2011; 9(1):136-155

Statement of Responsibility

Jean M. Canil, Bruce A. Rosser

Conference Name

Abstract

Using a unique data set, we test theoretical propositions relating to grant size and exercise price in determination of optimal executive compensation. For Hall and Murphy, pay-performance sensitivity does not behave as predicted with respect to CEO risk aversion and diversification, but the latter supports observed grant size while ATM grants exhibit positive abnormal returns as predicted. Consistent with Choe, exercise price is found inversely related to leverage. The unexpected positive relation between grant size and stock volatility is conjectured driven by CEOs’ influencing large grants, which are found associated with weak corporate governance but ameliorated by outside directors.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

Copyright status unknown

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record