Creativity predicts standardized educational outcomes beyond GPA and personality

Date

2025

Authors

Kapoor, H.
Patston, T.
Cropley, D.H.
Rezaei, S.
Kaufman, J.C.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2025; 56(101751):1-12

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

Abstract

Despite popular stereotypes about schools killing creativity, most scholarship on academic achievement and creativity shows a positive relationship. The present study is an extension and conceptual replication of Kaufman et al. (2023) using the Australian National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN), including literacy and numeracy scores from Australian student participants (Ns = 212 to 637, across analyzes). Using hierarchical regressions, we examined whether GPA, personality, self-reported creativity, intellectual risk-taking (IRT), divergent thinking flexibility, and verbal/math creativity predicted NAPLAN literacy/numeracy standardized scores. The addition of creativity-related variables (higher flexibility) explained an additional 7.5 % variance in NAPLAN literacy scores above GPA and personality, whereas an additional 9.2 % of variance was explained in NAPLAN numeracy scores by creativity-related variables (lower IRT but higher math creativity). These findings support the notion that performance on standardized educational tests is benefitted by student creativity; suggestions for future research with different standardized tests and creativity assessments, across cultures, are provided.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

Copyright 2025 Elsevier Access Condition Notes: Accepted manuscript available after 01 January 2026

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record