Representing science: An own goal?
Date
2025
Authors
Sawyer, W.
Hattam, R.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Australian Educational Researcher, online, 2025; online(5):1-16
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
In the 2023 Scott Report, Strong Beginnings, the Teacher Education Expert Panel (TEEP) in Australia made a series of recommendations which effectively echoed recent ‘reform’ in England on pre-service teacher education. Based on Australia’s ongoing version of ‘PISA panic’, the Report pointed to its findings as being based on research provided by the Australian Education Research Organisation (AERO). In its Priority Reform 1 on Initial Teacher Education (ITE) (‘Strengthening initial teacher education programs to deliver confident, effective beginning teachers’), the Report’s recommendations reflected recent international focus on learning science. In the Discussion Paper which preceded Strong Beginnings, five papers were described as ‘seminal’ as underpinning the case for strong focus on learning science and alleged pedagogical implications, such as a central focus on specific versions of explicit instruction, mastery learning, or the implications of cognitive load research. Above all, there was a strong emphasis on the universal applicability of these approaches. In this paper, we examine the arguments of these seminal papers and question the extent to which they actually do underpin the claims of universal applicability made in Strong Beginnings and its Discussion Paper, with particular emphasis on the most comprehensive of these papers. Some of these papers present less certainty than their representation would suggest and, in fact, throw up a problematic issue of representation in the current fashion for learning sciences and associated fields
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2025 The Authors. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Access Condition Notes: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.