A review of selection criteria for ophthalmology training in the Western world

Files

hdl_147101.pdf (494.08 KB)
  (Published version)

Date

2025

Authors

Muecke, T.
Petrash, C.
Petrovski, G.
Bacchi, S.
Casson, R.
Chan, W.O.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Eye, 2025; 39(11):2238-2244

Statement of Responsibility

Thomas Muecke, Carson Petrash, Goran Petrovski, Stephen Bacchi, Robert Casson, and Weng Onn Chan

Conference Name

Abstract

Background: To (a) analyse, compare and learn from the global variations in ophthalmology training applicant selection criteria, specifically CV assessment, and (b) provide a discussion of evidence supporting such selection criteria. Methods: An observational analysis on the selection criteria used to assess candidates applying to ophthalmology training programs within the US, Canada, European Union / European Economic Union (EU/EEA), United Kingdom (UK) and Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). Presence of a publicly available selection criteria policy for the 2025 intake was searched for on national and local college, society, federation and training program websites. The selection criteria employed for assessing applicant CV, and its associated scoring (if existent), were recorded for the included programs. Descriptive statistics was applied to these data. Results: 174 accredited ophthalmology training programs were identified, and 51/174 publish a publicly available selection criteria policy. Overall, the most important criteria from ophthalmic training bodies in the Western world include research experience, academic achievements, particularly in the form of awards and prizes, references supporting evidence of favourable personal and professional characteristics, and evidence of involvement in extracurricular activities that produce evidence of a wellfounded interest in ophthalmology. Conclusions: Each region adopts varying selection processes and frameworks, which, rather than reflect a standardised international approach to selecting an “ideal” ophthalmology trainee, perhaps select for the specific needs of the country and or training program. The study is limited by its observational nature.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

© Crown 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record