Good bite mark evidence: A case report

Date

2006

Authors

James, H.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology, 2006; 24(1):12-13

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

Abstract

Bite mark analysis is unquestionably the most difficult, and contentious, work undertaken by forensic odontologists. Each injury must be assessed to determine if it was made by human or animal teeth, if the quality of the evidence allows presentation to a Court of Law, and if the pattern can be reasonably compared to a suspect dentition. Many injuries examined by forensic odontologists do not meet these criteria. A case is presented in which a Victim Statement could be corroborated, with evidence of good probative value.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

License

Grant ID

Published Version

Call number

Persistent link to this record