Australia and the United States: Two common criminal justice systems uncommonly at odds
Date
2004
Authors
Waye, Vicki C.
Marcus, P
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 12:27-110
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
At first glance the criminal justice systems of Australia and the United States look strikingly similar. With common law roots from England, they both emphasize the adversary system, the role of the advocate, the presumption of innocence, and an appeals process. Upon closer reflection, however, they appear starkly different. From both Australian and U.S. perspectives, the authors explore those differences, examining important features such as the exclusion of evidence, rules regarding interrogation, the entrapment defense, and the open nature of trials. The article concludes with an analysis of the reasons for those differences, reasons that heavily relate back to the founding of the two nations and the drafting of distinctly dissimilar constitutions.
School/Discipline
Law School