Presumption of harm and descriptions of child sexual victimization: sentencing the victim-offender
Files
(Published version)
Date
2025
Authors
Arnold, B.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
British Journal of Criminology, online, 2025; online(6):1-19
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
Child sexual abuse is presumed to be inherently harmful. During sentencing, the victim's harm is relevant as a purpose for punishment and for determining the penalty, and the sentencing remarks communicate the reasons underpinning the offender's punishment. This article explores a sample of sentencing remarks of sexually abused child sexual offenders made in three Australian jurisdictions between 2005 and 2018. It finds that the presumption of harm is routinely extended to the immediate victims, but rarely extended to victim-offenders. In some cases, judges used language which minimized the victim-offenders' experiences. The article argues that the presumption of harm should be extended to victim-offenders and their harm acknowledged, to promote sentencing's communicative function and help to facilitate its rehabilitative purpose.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2025 The Authors. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Access Condition Notes: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (htps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.