A simple battle model with explanatory power
Date
2010
Authors
Pincombe, A.
Pincombe, B.
Pearce, C.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Conference paper
Citation
Proceedings of EMAC 2009, held at the University of Adelaide, 6-9 December 2009, 2010: pp.C497-C511
Statement of Responsibility
Adrian Hall Pincombe, Brandon Pincombe and Charles Pearce
Conference Name
EMAC (2009 : Adelaide, Australia)
Abstract
Attrition equations have military use and are also used in biological and economic modelling. We model the aggregation of attrition in a battle to explain the strong support in historical data for the log law, which conventionally is thought to apply mainly to losses through accident or illness. Support for the log law has been found in many studies of battle data and this has yet to be explained. Several historical studies found support for a mixture of attrition laws, suggesting that different laws could apply to different parts of the battle. We hypothesise that the log law could be supported through aggregation effects when other laws apply on a micro scale. We assume that all laws work at skirmish level and show that aggregation effects will only support the log law if the individual skirmishes being aggregated are themselves modelled by the log law. We argue that the extreme support for the log law in the Kursk dataset is due to an overwhelming support for that law at the level of individual skirmishes, and that the conventional use of square and linear law for skirmishes is incorrect. These results suggest that theoretical changes to attrition equations should be based on studies of small unit attrition as aggregation effects do not cause cross over from square or linear laws to log law.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright Austral. Mathematical Soc. 2010