Elevated scaled scores when using the digital version of the WISC-V coding subtest
Date
2025
Authors
Malarbi, S.
Ellis, R.
Josev, E.K.
Haebich, K.M.
Nguyen, T.N.N.
Lau, K.
Burnett, A.C.
Pride, N.
Payne, J.M.
Anderson, P.J.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Child Neuropsychology, 2025; 31(7):1031-1043
Statement of Responsibility
Stephanie Malarbi, Rachel Ellis, Elisha K. Josev, Kristina M. Haebich, Thi-Nhu-Ngoc Nguyen, Kristal Lau, Alice C. Burnett, Natalie Pride, Jonathan M. Payne, Peter J. Anderson
Conference Name
Abstract
This study investigated the digital version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) Coding subtest in a large Australian clinical and non-clinical sample of 6–11 year old children (N = 794). Data was retrospectively pooled from several studies. Results showed the digital Coding scaled score was significantly elevated compared with all other subtests (M difference = 2.01, 95% CI. 1.74–2.27). Overall FSIQ was higher when calculated using Coding compared with Symbol Search (M difference = 2.067, 95% CI. 1.79–2.34). The Coding and Symbol Search discrepancy in digital administration did not vary according to age and was unrelated to general intelligence. Girls scored higher on average than boys on the digital Coding subtest, but there was no sex effect for the digital Symbol Search subtest (girls: M = 10.76, 95% CI 10.41–11.12; boys: M = 10.27, 95% CI 9.92–10.63). Inflated digital Coding scaled scores were observed across our subsamples of clinical and non-clinical cases, without any significant group differences. Overall, our findings support the notion that the digital WISC-V Coding subtest is inflated, particularly for girls, supporting cessation in the digital administration of this subtest.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.