Fluid or Melt? Distinguishing Syn-Deformational Interaction Pathways

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGhatak, H.
dc.contributor.authorDaczko, N.
dc.contributor.authorPiazolo, S.
dc.contributor.authorRaimondo, T.
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionData source: supporting information, https://doi.org/10.1111/jmg.70008
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding whether deformation occurred in the presence of aqueous fluid or silicate melt is crucial for interpreting ductile shear zones, impacting their thermal and geochemical evolution, and having rheological consequences. To identify the syn-deformational fluid type, we investigate contrasting shear zones active during the Alice Springs Orogeny in central Australia, focusing on their effects on dry granulite facies gneisses transformed into greenschist–amphibolite facies schists. Shear zones in the north-western part of the orogen (Reynolds–Anmatjira Ranges) exhibit greenschist–lower amphibolite facies muscovite– chlorite assemblages, quartz veins and microstructures indicative of solid-state deformation. These features collectively suggest deformation in the presence of aqueous fluid. In contrast, shear zones in the south-eastern part (Strangways Range) display upper amphibolite facies garnet–biotite–sillimanite assemblages, along with granitic dykes and lenses retaining igneous textures. Microstructures, such as ‘string of bead’ textures and felsic minerals forming films along grain boundaries or exhibiting low apparent dihedral angles, indicate the former presence of melt in high strain rocks. This suggests that hydration in the south-eastern shear zones was driven by externally sourced silicate melt and melt–rock reactions. Differentiating between the two types of shear zones using whole rock major and trace element data is challenging. However, rare earth element (REE) analyses show potential. Limited REE metasomatism is observed where aqueous fluids are inferred, with three samples in a transect displaying consistent patterns. In contrast, where silicate melt is interpreted as the metasomatic agent, REE metasomatism is more variable, exhibiting atypical REE patterns relative to common rock types and considerable variability between samples in a transect. This contrast is attributed to greater mobility of REEs in silicate melt compared to aqueous fluid.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityHindol Ghatak, Nathan R. Daczko, Sandra Piazolo, Tom Raimondo
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Metamorphic Geology, online, 2025; 43(8):810-838
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jmg.70008
dc.identifier.issn0263-4929
dc.identifier.issn1525-1314
dc.identifier.orcidRaimondo, T. [0000-0001-9115-9196]
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/147903
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP160103449
dc.rights© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Metamorphic Geology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jmg.70008
dc.subjectaqueous fluid; fluid–rock interaction; melferite; melt–rock interaction; mylonite; silicate melt
dc.titleFluid or Melt? Distinguishing Syn-Deformational Interaction Pathways
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Collections

Research Outputs