The impact of primary health care services, continuity of care and patterns of care on mortality and hospitalisation-related outcomes in residents of long-term care facilities: a comprehensive national evaluation
Files
(Published version)
Date
2026
Authors
Inacio, M.C.
Schwabe, J.
Crotty, M.
Williams, H.
Wesselingh, S.L.
Kellie, A.
Roder, D.
Nixon, K.-L.
Harvey, G.
Sluggett, J.K.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Age and Ageing, 2026; 55(2):afag026-1-afag026-12
Statement of Responsibility
Maria C. Inacio, Johannes Schwabe, Maria Crotty, Helena Williams, Steve L. Wesselingh, Andrew Kellie, David Roder, Krystal-lee Nixon, Gillian Harvey, Janet K. Sluggett, Monica Cations, Tiffany K. Gill, Jyoti Khadka, Megan Corlis, Carolyn Dawkins, Marilyn Von Thien, Gillian Elizabeth Caughey
Conference Name
Abstract
Introduction High-quality evidence on the benefits of primary care in long-term care (LTC) is lacking. This study investigated the effect of primary health care services, continuity of care and care patterns on the risk of mortality and hospitalisation-related outcomes in LTC facility residents. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 358354 residents of 2948 LTC facilities across Australia was conducted (1 January 2013–31 December 2019). Primary care services, general practitioner (GP) continuity of care, and care patterns were examined. One-year risk of all-cause/premature mortality and nine hospitalisation measures were investigated. Propensity-score–adjusted survival models were employed. Results Residents with a care pattern inclusive of high preventive health services utilisation and low urgent after-hours attendances had lower risks of mortality [vs. high overall use, hazard ratio (HR)=0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.88–0.94; vs. high reactive use, HR=0.91, 95% CI=0.88–0.94] and most outcomes examined [e.g. fractures, subdistribution hazard ratio (sHRs) range=0.90–0.91, 95% CI range=0.84–0.97] compared to those with other care patterns. Residents who continued to see their usual GP had a lower risk of emergency department presentations (sHR=0.92, 95% CI=0.90–0.94), unplanned hospitalisations (sHR=0.94, 95% CI=0.92–0.96), falls (sHR=0.89, 95% CI=0.86–0.92), malnutrition (sHR=0.88, 95% CI=0.82–0.96), and dementia/delirium hospitalisations (sHR=0.79, 95% CI=0.72–0.87) than those who did not. Nurse practitioner attendances, optometrical services, comprehensive medication reviews, health assessments, management plans and podiatry attendances on their own were associated with lower premature mortality and some hospitalisation-related outcomes. Conclusions Care patterns focusing on prevention and disease management, GP continuity of care and certain primary care services can positively impact residents’ health and outcomes in LTC facilities
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)