The Acute Effects of Wind Farm Versus Road Traffic Noise Onset on Electroencephalographically Defined Arousal From Sleep: Findings From an In-Laboratory Randomised Controlled Trial
Date
2025
Authors
Lechat, B.
Micic, G.
Scott, H.
Dunbar, C.
Nguyen, D.P.
Hansen, K.
Toson, B.
Liebich, T.
Decup, F.
Vakulin, A.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Journal of Sleep Research, 2025; e70227-e70227
Statement of Responsibility
Bastien Lechat, Gorica Micic, Hannah Scott, Claire Dunbar, Duc Phuc Nguyen, Kristy Hansen, Barbara Toson, Tessa Liebich, Felix Decup, Andrew Vakulin, Nicole Lovato, Leon Lack, Colin Hansen, Dorothy Bruck, Ching Li Chai-Coetzer, Jeremy Mercer, Con Doolan, Branko Zajamsek, Peter Catcheside
Conference Name
Abstract
Wind farm noise (WFN) exposure effects on sleep remain poorly understood. This study compared the probability of electroencephalographically (EEG) defined arousal from established sleep following WFN versus road traffic noise (RTN) onset. Sixty-eight adults were studied in a sleep laboratory on one night with repeated 20-s WFN and RTN exposures. Following ≥ 2 min of established sleep and ≥ 20-s between noise exposures, pre-recorded WFN or RTN samples were reproduced at sound pressure levels (SPLs) of 30, 40, and 50 dBA in random order. The primary outcome was the probability of EEG-defined arousal events (> 3 s EEG shifts to faster frequencies) following the onset of each noise exposure. Awakening responses (> 15 s EEG frequency shifts) were also evaluated. Noise type, SPL, and sleep stage effects on arousal and awakening response probabilities were evaluated using mixed effects logistic regression analyses. Of 68 participants, 62 (mean ± SD aged 49 ± 20 years, 35 females) had sufficient replicates of noise exposure data for analysis. Arousal response probabilities were low, particularly in deep sleep, but showed a significant noise type-by-SPL interaction (χ2 = 13, p = 0.001), with marginally but significantly lower WFN compared to RTN arousal probabilities at 40 dBA (mean [95% CI]: 2.1 [1.5, 2.9] vs. 3.2 [2.4, 4.2]%, p = 0.016) and 50 dBA (5.0 [4.0, 6.2] vs. 8.6 [6.9, 10.6]%, p < 0.001). Awakenings were infrequent (< 4% at 50 dBA) but showed similar effects. These findings show that acute WFN onset is marginally less sleep disruptive than road traffic noise events of equivalent SPL ≥ 40 dBA.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
First published: 22 October 2025.
OnlinePubl
Access Status
Rights
© 2025 European Sleep Research Society.