<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-23T05:09:05Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:digital.library.adelaide.edu.au:2440/37957" metadataPrefix="dim">https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:digital.library.adelaide.edu.au:2440/37957</identifier><datestamp>2007-09-05T08:41:56Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2440_14759</setSpec><setSpec>col_2440_14760</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en">Smolicz, J. J.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en">White, Mathew A</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="school" lang="en">School of Education</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en">2004</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/2440/37957</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en">The aims of this study were to define an Australian boarding school, provide a summary of
international and Australian boarding school literature, and complete a small-scale qualitative
investigation of students' views in a co-educational boarding school. At first glance, it appeared
that contemporary Australian boarding schools were a reproduction of the influential public
boys' schools of Great Britain. Although there have been a number of histories of Australian
independent schools, the boarding element has often been portrayed as Dickensian and
remains an overlooked area of educational research. In particular, the literature available about
Australian residential schooling over the past 20 years has been limited to a handful of
significant studies by Cree and Trimingham Jack.
In this study 45 Australian and overseas students were asked to write memoirs of 4-5,000
words about their boarding experience emphasising their thoughts, feelings and aspirations.
The limitation was that all respondents were full-time boarders for at least one year when the
questionnaire-survey was completed. The memoir-based humanistic approach of the Polish-
American sociologist Florian Znaniecki, as developed for the analysis of personal and group
social systems in the culturally diverse context of Australia by J. J. Smolicz, was employed to
interpret the memoir data.
The memoir method has been well documented in Australia, as a means of collecting and
analysing concrete and cultural facts, mainly in relation to the study of minority ethnic groups
and their cultural actions. The humanistic approach emphasized that the researcher must
accept cultural phenomena from the viewpoint of its participants and not from that of an outside
observer. In the present study, this approach permitted the researcher to understand the
experiences and attitudes of individual students towards an Australian co-educational boarding
education through their own eyes.
The memoirs analysed were generated from 26 concrete questions, which revealed place-of-birth,
ethnic identity, and languages spoken at home. This provided the researcher with
verifiable information about the everyday lives of the respondents. The second half of the
memoirs required response to 23 questions - these yielded cultural data. These questions
required students to reflect on their situation, attitudes and experiences of boarding as a
system of education. This information could only have been provided by the participants
themselves and gave the researcher direct access to the memoir writers' individual and group
consciousness.
The study discovered that a number of the students were in the process of re-evaluating and
re-interpreting the advantages and disadvantages of boarding school as a social system
transmitted to them by parents, friends, family, and teachers. The respondent's personal
statements revealed that the relationships among students and among students and staff in the
boarding House tended to be primary in nature, in that they were personal, informal, and
involved the entire human personality. From these data, it appeared that the success of a
boarding school was determined by the personal atmosphere, support, and comfort of the
boarding House.
Consideration of the empirical data found that 43 of the 45 respondents' memoirs believed that
their overall experiences at the research boarding school were positive. Negative observations
stressed the pressures of homesickness, tedium of school life and a lack of freedom thereby
supporting Goffman's view of a "total institution". The majority of students' memoirs were
ambivalent towards religion at the research school. Nevertheless, 11 stressed its significant
implication in their day-to-day lives. The memoirs suggested that an education at the research
boarding school was a crucible that forged students through a variety of experiences, positive
and negative, individual and collective, for life.
Overall, the memoirs support the observation that boarding school acts as a social system for
the acceptance of new cultural values, such as the cultural diversity respondents' experienced
in their lives at boarding school. The study revealed an attitudinal shift in the group that
welcomed the cultural pluralism of the school and recognised the cultural monism of the home.
These memoirs revealed that boarding school was a significant factor in fostering
independence and embracing cultural diversity as experienced in the crucible of the boarding
school. These findings challenged the popular maxim that an Australian residential education
was an anachronistic, inflexible, colonial-British model and suggested that it has the potential to
act as a system of education that prepares its students for the challenges of life.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="dissertation" lang="en">Thesis (Ph.D.)--School of Education, 2004.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en">2166641 bytes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en">68283 bytes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype" lang="en">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype" lang="en">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en">en</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en">boarding schools, boarding school students, private schools, coeducation, sociology, educational sociology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en">An Australian co-educational boarding school as a crucible for life: a humanistic sociological study of students' attitudes from their own memoirs.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en">Thesis</dim:field>open.access</dim:dim></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>