Thalbourne, M.Storm, L.2018-12-042018-12-042015Australian Journal of Parapsychology, 2015; 15(1):81-871445-2308http://hdl.handle.net/2440/116574Over a series of studies, M. A. Thalbourne tried to influence the digital output of a random number generator to demonstrate that psychokinesis (PK) can be influenced by 'Kundalini' (an alleged body-energy). The series did not indicate a consistent Kundalini-PK effect. It was later thought that a feedback artifact might explain some of the psi outcomes. In this paper, we show that there is no evidence supporting a feedback artifact. Inspection of past results does suggest a Kundalini- PK effect, but a more objective experimental procedure is advised.en© 2015 AIPR, Inc.Kundalini; pro attitude; psi; psychokinesis; PK; random number generatorDebunking an alleged feedback artifact in Thalbourne's RNG studiesJournal article0030045875240997Storm, L. [0000-0002-6228-6150]