Chang, J.Lim Joon, D.Lee, S.Gong, S.Anderson, N.Scott, A.Davis, I.Clouston, D.Bolton, D.Hamilton, C.Khoo, V.2017-06-072017-06-072012International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 2012; 83(5):e691-e6960360-30161879-355Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/105797PURPOSE: To demonstrate the technical feasibility of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose painting using¹¹C-choline positron emission tomography PET scans in patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was an RT planning study of 8 patients with prostate cancer who had ¹¹C-choline PET scans prior to radical prostatectomy. Two contours were semiautomatically generated on the basis of the PET scans for each patient: 60% and 70% of the maximum standardized uptake values (SUV(60%) and SUV(70%)). Three IMRT plans were generated for each patient: PLAN(78), which consisted of whole-prostate radiation therapy to 78 Gy; PLAN(78-90), which consisted of whole-prostate RT to 78 Gy, a boost to the SUV(60%) to 84 Gy, and a further boost to the SUV(70%) to 90 Gy; and PLAN(72-90), which consisted of whole-prostate RT to 72 Gy, a boost to the SUV(60%) to 84 Gy, and a further boost to the SUV(70%) to 90 Gy. The feasibility of these plans was judged by their ability to reach prescription doses while adhering to published dose constraints. Tumor control probabilities based on PET scan-defined volumes (TCP(PET)) and on prostatectomy-defined volumes (TCP(path)), and rectal normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were compared between the plans. RESULTS: All plans for all patients reached prescription doses while adhering to dose constraints. TCP(PET) values for PLAN(78), PLAN(78-90), and PLAN(72-90) were 65%, 97%, and 96%, respectively. TCP(path) values were 71%, 97%, and 89%, respectively. Both PLAN(78-90) and PLAN(72-90) had significantly higher TCP(PET) (P=.002 and .001) and TCP(path) (P<.001 and .014) values than PLAN(78). PLAN(78-90) and PLAN(72-90) were not significantly different in terms of TCP(PET) or TCP(path). There were no significant differences in rectal NTCPs between the 3 plans. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT dose painting for localized prostate cancer using (11)C-choline PET scans is technically feasible. Dose painting results in higher TCPs without higher NTCPs.enCopyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Dose painting; C-choline, Positron emission tomography; prostrate cancer; IMRTJournal article003006481810.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.0870003061281000192-s2.0-84863625901288849