A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential

Pitcher, J.Doeltgen, S.Goldsworthy, M.Schneider, L.Vallence, A.Smith, A.Semmler, J.McDonnell, M.Ridding, M.2016-05-062016-05-062015Clinical Neurophysiology, 2015; 126(12):2337-23411388-24571872-8952http://hdl.handle.net/2440/98582Abstract not availableen© 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.Corticomotor stimulus–response curves; Resting motor threshold; Ageing; Children; Motor evoked potential; First dorsal interosseousA comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potentialJournal article003002517010.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.0110003653499000162-s2.0-84948720726178328Pitcher, J. [0000-0002-9648-7540]Goldsworthy, M. [0000-0002-0688-9475]Smith, A. [0000-0001-6316-2259]Semmler, J. [0000-0003-0260-8047]Ridding, M. [0000-0001-5657-9136]