Thwin, M.Weitzel, E.McMains, K.Athanasiadis, T.Psaltis, A.Field, J.Wormald, P.2010-09-162010-09-162009American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, 2009; 23(1):33-351945-89241945-8932http://hdl.handle.net/2440/60589Background: The Lund-MacKay score (LMS) is the standard for communicating radiological extent of chronic rhinosinusitis in research. However, retrospective analyses are often hindered by a substantial lack of radiological data. Calculating LMS from radiologists' reports may overcome this but has not been formally validated. Methods: Twenty South Australian and 20 Texan patients with varying degrees of sinus disease were randomly chosen to undergo analysis. CT-derived LMSs were calculated directly by two expert rhinologists at each institution and compared with scores derived solely from accompanying radiology reports by two blinded reviewers. Results: The total LMS obtained via the expert rhinologists correlated very highly with that obtained from radiology reports (Spearman rank correlation, 0.75-0.88; p < 0.001). However, when individual sinuses were specifically analyzed, the correlation was highly variable. Conclusion: The results show that in both South Australian and Texan tertiary rhinology centers, radiologists' reports can be reliably used to calculate the total LMS.enChronic sinusitisCT scansdisease severityLund and MacKay scoreoutcome measuresradiology reportsretrospective dataJournal article002009050810.2500/ajra.2009.23.32550002649959000072-s2.0-7014911583639030Psaltis, A. [0000-0003-2197-0797] [0000-0003-2967-1855]Wormald, P. [0000-0001-7753-7277]