Bacon, A.Paix, A.Williamson, J.Webb, R.Chapman, M.2006-12-032006-12-032005BMJ Quality and Safety, 2005; 14(3):e18/WWW 1-WWW 51475-38981475-3901http://hdl.handle.net/2440/17178© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.Objectives: To examine the role of a previously described core algorithm "COVER ABCD–A SWIFT CHECK", supplemented by a specific sub-algorithm for pneumothorax, in the management of pneumothorax occurring in association with anaesthesia. Methods: Reports of pneumothorax were extracted and studied from the first 4000 incidents reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study (AIMS). The potential performance of the structured approach, using the combination of algorithims described above for each of the relevant incidents, was compared with the actual management as reported by the anaesthetists involved. Results: Pneumothorax was noted as a possible diagnosis in 65 reports; 24 cases had a confirmed pneumothorax, of which 17 were in association with general anaesthesia. It was considered that, correctly applied, the application of the algorithms would have led to earlier recognition of the problem and/or better management in 12% of cases. Conclusion: Any pneumothorax may become a dangerous tension pneumothorax with the application of positive pressure ventilation. Limited access to the chest during anaesthesia may compromise the diagnosis. Recognition of any preoperative predisposition to a pneumothorax (for example, iatrogenic or traumatic penetrating procedures around the base of the neck) and close communication with the surgeon are important. Aspiration diagnosis in suspected cases and correct insertion of a chest drain are essential for the safe conduct of anaesthesia and surgery.enpneumothoraxanaesthesia complicationscrisis managementcentral venous catheter complicationstracheostomy complicationssyringe aspiration testdiagnostic algorithmJournal article002005056210.1136/qshc.2002.0044240002295433000352-s2.0-3454808425654958Chapman, M. [0000-0003-0710-3283]