Stress partitioning and wellbore failure in the West Tuna area, Gippsland Basin

Abstract

Abstract Image logs from the deep intra-Latrobe and Golden Beach Subgroups of the West Tuna area in the Gippsland Basin reveal that wellbore failure is restricted to fast, cemented sandstone units and does not occur in interbedded shales. Triaxial testing and analysis of empirically derived, wireline-log based strength equations reveals uniaxial compressive strengths of 60 MPa in sandstones and 30 MPa in shales in the West Tuna area. Conventional analysis of wellbore failure assumes constant stresses in the shales and adjacent sandstones and that breakout is focused in the weaker units. We propose that the flat lying, strong, cemented sandstone units in the West Tuna area act as a stress-bearing framework within the present-day stress regime that is characterised by very high horizontal stresses (SHmax > Shmin = Sv). Stress focusing in strong sandstone units can result in high stress concentrations at the wellbore wall and account for the restriction of wellbore failure to the strong sandstone units. Finite element methods were used to investigate the stress distribution in horizontal, interbedded ?strong? sands and ?weak? shales subject to a high present-day stress state such as exists in the West Tuna area (SHmax > Sv ~ Shmin). Modelling using the present-day stress tensor and estimated elastic properties for the sandstones and shales indicates that the present-day stress is ?partitioned? between ?strong? inter-bedded sandstones and ?weaker? shales, with high stress being focussed into the strong sandstones. The stress focusing causes borehole breakout in the sands despite their higher strength. Conversely, stresses are too low to generate wellbore failure in the weaker shales.