Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/81876
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Blomqvist, L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Brook, B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ellis, E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kareiva, P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nordhaus, T. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shellenberger, M. | - |
dc.contributor.editor | Mace, G.M. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | PLoS Biology, 2013; 11(11):1-6 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1544-9173 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1545-7885 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/81876 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The global overshoot indicated by Ecological Footprint calculations consists entirely of an unreliable reframing of human carbon emissions and none of the five other land-use categories—cropland, grazing land, built-up land, fishing grounds, and forests. The Ecological Footprint is therefore “so misleading as to preclude its use in any serious science or policy context,” argue Blomqvist et al. in this perspective. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Linus Blomqvist, Barry W. Brook, Erle C. Ellis, Peter M. Kareiva, Ted Nordhaus, Michael Shellenberger | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Public Library of Science | - |
dc.rights | © 2013 Blomqvist et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700 | - |
dc.subject | Humans | - |
dc.subject | Conservation of Energy Resources | - |
dc.subject | United Nations | - |
dc.subject | Guidelines as Topic | - |
dc.subject | Ecological and Environmental Phenomena | - |
dc.subject | Carbon Footprint | - |
dc.subject | Environmental Policy | - |
dc.title | Does the shoe fit? Real versus imagined ecological footprints | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.contributor.organisation | Environment Institute | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 4 Environment Institute Leaders publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
hdl_81876.pdf | Published version | 274.18 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.