Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/84886
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: A systematic review
Author: Rosman, A.
Guijt, A.
Vlemmix, F.
Rijnders, M.
Mol, B.
Kok, M.
Citation: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2013; 92(2):137-142
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
Issue Date: 2013
ISSN: 0001-6349
1600-0412
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Ageeth N. Rosman, Aline Guijt, Floortje Vlemmix, Marlies Rijnders, Ben W. J. Mol & Marjolein Kok
Abstract: Objective. External cephalic version (ECV) is a safe and effective intervention that can prevent breech delivery, thus reducing the need for cesarean delivery. It is recommended in national guidelines. These guidelines also mention contraindications for ECV, and thereby restrict the application of ECV. We assessed whether the formulation of these contraindications in guidelines are based on empiric data.Design. Systematic review. Population. Pregnant women with a singleton breech presentation from 34 weeks. Methods. We searched the National Guideline Clearinghouse, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (1953-2009), EMBASE (1980-2009), TRIP database (until 2011), NHS (National Health Services, until 2011), Diseases database (until 2011) and NICE guidelines (until 2011) for existing guidelines on ECV and studied the reproducibility of the contraindications stated in the guidelines. Furthermore, we systematically reviewed the literature for contraindications and evidence on these contraindications.Main outcomemeasures. Contraindications of ECV. Results. We found five guidelines mentioning 18 contraindications, varying fromfive to 13 per guideline. The contraindicationswere not reproducible between the guidelines with oligohydramnios as the only contraindication mentioned in all guidelines. The literature search yielded 60 studies reporting on 39 different contraindications, of which we could only assess evidence of six of them. Conclusion. The present study shows that there is no general consensus on the eligibility of patients for ECV. Therefore we propose to limit contraindications for ECV to clear empirical evidence or to those with a clear pathophysiological relevance.
Keywords: Breech; contraindications; external cephalic version; fetal version; systematic review
Rights: © 2012 The Authors
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12011
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12011
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.