Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Thirty years experience with heart valve surgery: isolated aortic valve replacement.|
|Citation:||Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1996; 66(12):799-805|
|Abstract:||<h4>Background</h4>Thirty years have elapsed since the commencement of open-heart surgery in South Australia. A retrospective study was performed to evaluate mortality and complication rates and to identify factors associated with poor outcomes in all patients who underwent prosthetic aortic valve replacement during this period.<h4>Methods</h4>Questionnaires and personal contact have been used to generate a combined database of pre-operative and post-operative information and long-term follow-up on 1322 patients who underwent isolated prosthetic aortic valve replacement at the Cardio-Thoracic Surgical Unit of the Royal Adelaide Hospital between 1963 and 1992.<h4>Results</h4>Complete survival follow-up data were obtained for 94% (1241) of the patients. The Bjork-Shiley valve was used in 66% (875) of the patients, a Starr-Edwards prosthesis in 31% (412), a St Jude prosthesis in 2% (26), and only 0.7% (9) bioprosthetic valves were inserted. The hospital mortality rate for the 30-year period was 2.9%. Progressively older and less fit patients have undergone surgery in recent years. The long-term survival of patients with aortic stenosis and aortic incompetence was not significantly different. Long-term survival was significantly shorter for patients with higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classifications, and for patients in pre-operative atrial fibrillation. Pre-operative dyspnoea was significantly improved following aortic valve replacement. The rates of postoperative haemorrhagic and embolic complications were low by comparison with other published series.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Aortic valve replacement can be performed with low hospital mortality and complication rates, and significant symptomatic improvement can be expected. Aortic valve recipients have a favourable prognostic outcome compared with an age- and sex-matched population, and risk factors that determine long-term survival can be identified pre-operatively.|
|Keywords:||Aortic Valve; Humans; Cardiovascular Diseases; Aortic Valve Insufficiency; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Embolism; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Postoperative Complications; Hospitalization; Reoperation; Hospital Mortality; Survival Rate; Bioprosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Middle Aged; Child; Female; Male; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Infections|
|Appears in Collections:||Surgery publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.