Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2002; 21(5):804-817||-|
|dc.description.abstract||The safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery with the aid of the Octopus® Tissue Stabilizer (Octopus OPCAB), in comparison to conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (CPB-CABG), was examined by a systematic assessment of the peer-reviewed literature. The limited comparative data suggested that there was no difference in safety outcomes between Octopus OPCAB and CPB-CABG. The paucity of efficacy data reported in the higher level comparative studies meant that it was impossible to assess whether Octopus OPCAB was more efficacious than CPB-CABG. The evidence base for the procedure was deemed inadequate and an audit of the procedure was recommended.||-|
|dc.description.statementofresponsibility||N.A. Scott, J.L. Knight, B.P. Bidstrup, H. Wolfenden, R. N. Linacre and G. J. Maddern||-|
|dc.publisher||Elsevier Science BV||-|
|dc.rights||© 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.||-|
|dc.title||Systematic review of beating heart surgery with the Octopus® Tissue Stabilizer||-|
|dc.title.alternative||Systematic review of beating heart surgery with the Octopus (R) Tissue Stabilizer||-|
|dc.identifier.orcid||Maddern, G. [0000-0003-2064-181X]||-|
|Appears in Collections:||Aurora harvest 7|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.