Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/104164
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Taylor, G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wright, D. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Melbourne University Law Review, 2002; 26(3):707-707 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0025-8938 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/104164 | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Grey Taylor | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Melbourne University Law Review Association | - |
dc.rights | Copyright status unknown | - |
dc.source.uri | http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MelbULawRw/2002/36.html | - |
dc.title | Privacy, injunctions and possums : an analysis of the high court’s decision in Australian Broadcasting Corporation v. Lenah Game Meats | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Taylor, G. [0000-0002-9393-9134] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 7 Law publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.