Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDafoe, S.-
dc.contributor.authorChapman, M.-
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, S.-
dc.contributor.authorStiller, K.-
dc.identifier.citationAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 2015; 43(6):719-727-
dc.description.abstractWe conducted a quality improvement project aimed at increasing the frequency of mobilisation in our ICU. We designed a four-part quality improvement project comprising: an audit documenting the baseline frequency of mobilisation; a staff survey evaluating perceptions of the barriers to mobilisation; identification of barriers that were amenable to change and implementation of strategies to address these; and a follow-up audit to determine their effectiveness. The setting was a tertiary care, urban, public hospital ICU in South Australia. All patients admitted to the ICU during the two audit periods were included in the audits, while all permanent/semi-permanent ICU staff were eligible for inclusion in the staff survey. We found that patient- and institution-related factors had the greatest impact on the mobilisation of patients in our ICU. Barriers identified as being amenable to change included insufficient staff education about the benefits of mobilisation, poor interdisciplinary communication and lack of leadership regarding mobilisation. Various strategies were implemented to address these barriers over a three-month period. Multivariable analyses showed that three out of four mobility outcomes did not significantly change between the baseline and follow-up audits, with a significant difference in favour of the baseline audit found for the fourth mobility outcome (maximum level of mobility). We concluded that implementing relatively simple measures to improve staff education, interdisciplinary communication and leadership regarding early progressive mobilisation was ineffective at improving mobility outcomes for patients in a large tertiary-level Australian ICU. Other strategies, such as changing sedation practices and/or increasing staffing, may be required to improve mobility outcomes of these patients.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityS. Dafoe, M. J. Chapman, S. Edwards, K. Stiller-
dc.publisherAustralian Society of Anaesthetists-
dc.rights© 2015 Anaesthesia and Intensive Care published by the Australian Society of Anaesthetists-
dc.subjectIntensive care; mobilisation; early ambulation; rehabilitation; physical therapy-
dc.titleOvercoming barriers to the mobilisation of patients in an intensive care unit-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.orcidEdwards, S. [0000-0003-2074-1685]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.