Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: The integration substitute: the role of controls in managing human asset specificity
Author: Sridharan, V.
Akroyd, C.
Citation: Accounting and Finance, 2011; 51(4):1055-1086
Publisher: Wiley
Issue Date: 2011
ISSN: 0810-5391
Statement of
VG Sridharan, Chris Akroyd
Abstract: As the integration solution to the problem of specific assets cannot be replicated on human asset specificity because slavery is illegal, economic theory states that control systems substitute for integration through a balanced structure to help align diverse interests. To understand the intricate design features of the balance, we examine a case-study firm. For low human asset specificity, the restriction and segregation of usable decision rights link with standards. However, incentives are traced to individuals only to the extent task deviations do not create relevant future costs that are difficult to be self-corrected. For high specificity, incentives are related to outputs rather than outcomes, because outcome variations reduce the attractiveness of maintaining the balance. Subjective assessment is used as an efficient alternate ‘balancing’ solution and decision control is shared when available subjective data are inadequate.
Keywords: Human asset specificity; management control; performance evaluation; decision rights; incentives
Rights: © 2011 The Authors. Accounting and Finance © 2011 AFAANZ
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00427.x
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Business School publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access553.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.