Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/109445
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCastles, M.-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Clinical Legal Education, 2016; 23(2):7-47-
dc.identifier.issn1467-1069-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/109445-
dc.description.abstractThe cost of clinical legal education courses has always been a challenge to law schools. In the last 40 years clinicians have developed and trialed many different innovations in clinical law, in response to increased student demand for clinical experience, and greater pressure on the legal services market. Two common models are the in house clinic and the externship placement. This article explores the idea of a ‘reverse externship’ – with private solicitors coming into an in house clinic to assist in the supervision of students on placement. It tracks the development and implementation of this initiative, and reports on both the practical challenges and the pedagogical benefits that we encountered.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMargaret Castles-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.rightsCopyright status unknown-
dc.subjectClinical legal education courses; CLE; reverse externship-
dc.titleMarriage of convenience or a match made in heaven? collaboration between a Law School clinic and a commercial law firm-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.