Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/109708
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNaicker, V.-
dc.contributor.authorNavissi, F.-
dc.contributor.authorSridharan, V.G.-
dc.contributor.editorLuft, J.-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Management Accounting Research, 2008; 20(1):133-152-
dc.identifier.issn1049-2127-
dc.identifier.issn1558-8033-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/109708-
dc.description.abstractUsing a sample of 99 New Zealand stock exchange-listed firms, we employ agency framework and strategy typology to examine whether the introduction of unionization legislation affects the value of prospector firms more negatively than defender firms. The results from this examination indicate that firms characterized by strategy of higher Growth-Diversity and Innovation-Risk experience greater loss in value. We attribute the results tot he higher agency costs associated with the strategies adopted by prospector firms. The results hold after controlling for variables such as size, industry membership, labour intensity, and proportion of unionized workers.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityVic Naiker, Farshid Navissi, VG Sridharan-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAmerican Accounting Association-
dc.rights© American Accounting Association-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2008.20.1.133-
dc.subjectAbnormal returns; unionization; agency costs; firm strategy-
dc.titleThe agency cost effects of unionization on firm value-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.2308/jmar.2008.20.1.133-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidSridharan, V.G. [0000-0002-6501-0694]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Business School publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.