Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Effectiveness of a peer-mediated educational intervention in improving general practitioner diagnostic assessment and management of dementia: a cluster randomised controlled trial
Author: Pond, D.
Mate, K.
Stocks, N.
Gunn, J.
DIsler, P.
Magin, P.
Marley, J.
Paterson, N.
Horton, G.
Goode, S.
Weaver, N.
Brodaty, H.
Citation: BMJ Open, 2018; 8(8):e021125-1-e021125-12
Publisher: BMJ Journals
Issue Date: 2018
ISSN: 2044-6055
Statement of
Dimity Pond, Karen Mate, Nigel Stocks, Jane Gunn, Peter Disler, Parker Magin, John Marley, Nerida Paterson, Graeme Horton, Susan Goode, Natasha Weaver, Henry Brodaty
Abstract: Objective Test effectiveness of an educational intervention for general practitioners (GPs) on quality of life and depression outcomes for patients. Design Double-blind, cluster randomised controlled trial. Setting General practices in Australia between 2007 and 2010. Participants General practices were randomly allocated to the waitlist (n=37) or intervention (n=66) group, in a ratio of 1:2. A total of 2030 (1478 intervention; 552 waitlist) community-dwelling participants aged 75 years or older were recruited via 168 GPs (113 intervention; 55 waitlist). Interventions A practice-based academic detailing intervention led by a peer educator that included: (1) training in use of the GP assessment of cognition dementia screening instrument; (2) training in diagnosis and management based on Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Dementia Guidelines; (3) addressing GPs’ barriers to dementia diagnosis; and (4) a business case outlining a cost-effective dementia assessment approach. Outcome measures Primary outcome measures were patient quality of life and depression; secondary outcome measures were: (1) sensitivity and specificity of GP identification of dementia; (2) referral to medical specialists and/or support services; (3) patient satisfaction with care; and (4) carer quality of life, depression and satisfaction with care. Results The educational intervention had no significant effect on patient quality of life or depression scores after 12 months. There were however improvements in secondary outcome measures including sensitivity of GP judgement of dementia (p=0.002; OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.92 to 18.73), satisfaction with GP communication for all patients (p=0.024; mean difference 2.1, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.93) and for patients with dementia (p=0.007; mean difference 7.44, 95% CI 2.02 to 12.86) and enablement of carers (p=0.0185; mean difference 24.77, 95% CI 4.15 to 45.40). Conclusion Practice-based academic detailing did not improve patient quality of life or depression scores but did improve detection of dementia in primary care and patient satisfaction with GP communication. Trial registration number ACTRN12607000117415; Preresults.
Keywords: dementia
Rights: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021125
Grant ID:
Published version:
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
General Practice publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_116005.pdfPublished version705.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.