Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/121012
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Comparative longitudinal study on the impact root canal treatment and other dental services have on oral health–related quality of life using self-reported health measures (oral health impact profile-14 and global health measures)
Author: Chew, T.
Brennan, D.
Rossi-Fedele, G.
Citation: Journal of Endodontics, 2019; 45(8):985-993.e1
Publisher: Elsevier
Issue Date: 2019
ISSN: 0099-2399
1878-3554
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Tallan Chew, David Brennan, Giampiero Rossi-Fedele
Abstract: Introduction: The literature assessing quality of life for subjects who have undergone root canal treatment (RCT) is scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of RCT with other dental services (exodontia, restorative, prosthodontics, periodontics, and negative controls [preventative and scale and clean]) on oral health–related quality of life. Methods: A random sample of 3000 adults aged 30–61 years was obtained from the Australian electoral roll in 2009. Data were collected through questionnaires, dental service logbooks, and treatment receipts. The impact their dentition had at baseline and the 2-year follow-up for the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 and the self-rated dental health score followed by “global transition statement of change” (GTSC) was assessed. Binary regression models were used to compare the outcomes. Results: Responses were collected from 1096 respondents (response rate = 36.5%). After adjustment (for age, sex, household income, and reason for visit), the RCT group had significant differences (P ≤ .05) to other dental services at the 2-year follow-up using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (odds ratio = 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.96) and GTSC (odds ratio = 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.09–0.88) but not with individual treatment groups. Using the self-rated dental health score/GTSC, only the prosthodontic treatment group had a significant difference to the RCT group at baseline, whereas the negative controls (P ≤ .01) had significant differences to the RCT group with the odds for improved health 5 times higher, at 2-year follow-up. Conclusions: The RCT group presented with similar oral health–related quality of life when compared with the other individual treatment groups; however, they consistently reported poorer oral health outcomes when the negative controls were included.
Keywords: Global health measures; Oral Health Impact Profile-14; quality of life; root canal treatment; self-rated dental health
Rights: © 2019 American Associationof Endodontists.
RMID: 0030118061
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.05.002
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/565321
Appears in Collections:Dentistry publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.