Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMa'Mun, S.R.-
dc.contributor.authorLoch, A.-
dc.contributor.authorYoung, M.-
dc.identifier.citationGlobal Environmental Change, 2020; 64:102128-1-102128-15-
dc.description.abstractIn many places irrigation systems rely on robust governance for continued existence. Elinor Ostrom listed design principles that should achieve robust governance, but doubted that any list could be both necessary and sufficient to result in robust governance. To date this assumption has never been formally tested. We conduct a meta-analysis and ultimately evaluate 62 case studies via fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to identify necessary/sufficient conditions for robust irrigation system governance. We identify four necessary conditions and seven configurations sufficient for robust governance. Further, we identify a union of conditions that, when absent, are likely to result in system failure.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilitySitti Rahma Ma'Muna, Adam Loch, Michael D. Young-
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.subjectCommon property; Qualitative comparative analysis; Governance design principles-
dc.titleRobust irrigation system institutions: A global comparison-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.orcidMa'Mun, S.R. [0000-0003-4594-4198]-
dc.identifier.orcidLoch, A. [0000-0002-1436-8768]-
dc.identifier.orcidYoung, M. [0000-0001-8205-689X]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Global Food Studies publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_126994.pdfSubmitted version8.5 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.