Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/128705
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Life cycle assessment of autoclaved aerated fly ash and concrete block production: a case study in China |
Author: | Shi, Y. Li, Y. Tang, Y. Yuan, X. Wang, Q. Hong, J. Zuo, J. |
Citation: | Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019; 26(25):25432-25444 |
Publisher: | Springer Nature |
Issue Date: | 2019 |
ISSN: | 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Yifei Shi, Yue Li, Yuzhou Tang, Xueliang Yuan, Qingsong Wang, Jinglan Hong, Jian Zuo |
Abstract: | With the rapid development of construction industry, consumption of concrete block has increased rapidly in China. As a kind of green building material and resource comprehensive utilization product, autoclaved aerated fly ash and concrete block have better performance in terms of heat preservation, sound insulation, and fire resistance. However, some typical issues are associated with autoclaved aerated fly ash and concrete block production process such as energy and material consumption as well as pollutant emissions. To examine the environmental and economic impacts of its production process is imperative. Choosing 1 m³ of autoclaved aerated fly ash and concrete block product as functional unit and "cradle to gate" as system boundary, a life cycle inventory is developed. The key processes and key materials with significant environmental impact are identified. Results show that the top four environmental impact categories are marine ecotoxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity, freshwater eutrophication, and human toxicity. Key processes are fly ash slurry production, lime grinding, and steam curing processes. These processes account for 46.58%, 26.00%, and 19.62% of the total environmental load respectively. The key materials are cement, lime, and natural gas, which account for 44.91%, 22.79%, and 20.61% respectively of overall environmental impact. Sensitivity analysis shows that the fly ash slurry production should be optimized preferentially, followed by lime grinding and steam curing processes. These findings are helpful to facilitate the sustainable production of autoclaved aerated fly ash and concrete block. |
Keywords: | Life cycle assessment; life cycle cost; construction material; waste utilization |
Rights: | © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11356-019-05708-8 |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05708-8 |
Appears in Collections: | Architecture publications Aurora harvest 8 |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.