1. Adelaide Research & Scholarship
  2. Schools and Disciplines
  3. Law School
  4. Law publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/129198
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBabie, P.T.en
dc.contributor.authorBrown, D.en
dc.contributor.authorGiancaspro, M.A.en
dc.contributor.authorCatterwell, R.en
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.citationOxford Property Law Blog, 2020en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/129198-
dc.description.abstractThis post considers the High Court of New Zealand’s decision in Ruscoe and Moore v Cryptopia Limited (In Liquidation) (‘Ruscoe and Moore’), which provides the most recent and most comprehensive judicial answer to the question of whether cryptocurrency is property.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityPaul Babie, David Brown, Mark Giancaspro, Ryan Catterwellen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniverity of Oxford, Faculty of Lawen
dc.rightsCopyright status unknownen
dc.source.urihttps://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-and-subject-groups/property-law/blog/2020/05/cryptocurrency-and-property-questionen
dc.titleCryptocurrency and the property questionen
dc.typeJournal articleen
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidBabie, P.T. [0000-0002-9616-3300]en
dc.identifier.orcidBrown, D. [0000-0003-0386-814X]en
dc.identifier.orcidGiancaspro, M.A. [0000-0002-0121-0590]en
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.