Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/131372
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSemmler, J.G.-
dc.contributor.authorHand, B.J.-
dc.contributor.authorSasaki, R.-
dc.contributor.authorMerkin, A.-
dc.contributor.authorOpie, G.M.-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationExperimental Brain Research, 2021; 239(9):2661-2678-
dc.identifier.issn0014-4819-
dc.identifier.issn1432-1106-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/131372-
dc.descriptionPublished online: 16 July 2021-
dc.description.abstractIt is commonly accepted that the brains capacity to change, known as plasticity, declines into old age. Recent studies have used a variety of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques to examine this age-related decline in plasticity in the primary motor cortex (M1), but the effects seem inconsistent and difficult to unravel. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on studies that have used different NIBS techniques to assess M1 plasticity with advancing age and offer some new perspective on NIBS strategies to boost plasticity in the ageing brain. We find that early studies show clear differences in M1 plasticity between young and older adults, but many recent studies with motor training show no decline in use-dependent M1 plasticity with age. For NIBS-induced plasticity in M1, some protocols show more convincing differences with advancing age than others. Therefore, our view from the NIBS literature is that it should not be automatically assumed that M1 plasticity declines with age. Instead, the effects of age are likely to depend on how M1 plasticity is measured, and the characteristics of the elderly population tested. We also suggest that NIBS performed concurrently with motor training is likely to be most effective at producing improvements in M1 plasticity and motor skill learning in older adults. Proposed NIBS techniques for future studies include combining multiple NIBS protocols in a co-stimulation approach, or NIBS strategies to modulate intracortical inhibitory mechanisms, in an effort to more effectively boost M1 plasticity and improve motor skill learning in older adults.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJohn G. Semmler, Brodie J. Hand, Ryoki Sasaki, Ashley Merkin and George M. Opie-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag-
dc.rights© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06163-z-
dc.subjectAgeing-
dc.subjectMotor cortex-
dc.subjectMotor skill learning-
dc.subjectNeuroplasticity-
dc.subjectTranscranial magnetic stimulation-
dc.titleAge-related changes in motor cortex plasticity assessed with non-invasive brain stimulation: an update and new perspectives-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00221-021-06163-z-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP200101009-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1139723-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidSemmler, J.G. [0000-0003-0260-8047]-
dc.identifier.orcidHand, B.J. [0000-0002-9778-343X]-
dc.identifier.orcidOpie, G.M. [0000-0001-7771-7569]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Physiology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.