Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/37600
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, G.en
dc.contributor.authorOpie, J.en
dc.date.issued2003en
dc.identifier.citationBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2003; 25(3):348-349en
dc.identifier.issn0140-525Xen
dc.identifier.issn1469-1825en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/37600-
dc.description.abstractWe are sympathetic with the broad aims of Perruchet & Vinter's “mentalistic” framework. But it is implausible to claim, as they do, that human cognition can be understood without recourse to unconsciously represented information. In our view, this strategy forsakes the only available mechanistic understanding of intelligent behaviour. Our purpose here is to plot a course midway between the classical unconscious and Perruchet & Vinter's own noncomputational associationism.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGerard O'Brien and Jon Opieen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge Univ Pressen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2002 Cambridge University Pressen
dc.source.urihttp://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=153541en
dc.titleThe computational baby, the classical bathwater, and the middle wayen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.provenancePublished online by Cambridge University Press 11 Jun 2003en
dc.identifier.rmid0020032488en
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0140525X02410060en
dc.identifier.pubid57418-
pubs.library.collectionPhilosophy publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidOpie, J. [0000-0001-6593-4750]en
Appears in Collections:Philosophy publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
O'Brien_37600.pdfPublished version56.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.