Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/38120
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGerrans, P.-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2002; 25(6):757-758-
dc.identifier.issn0140-525X-
dc.identifier.issn1469-1825-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/38120-
dc.description.abstractEither genetically specified modular cognitive architecture for syntactic processing does not exist (neuroconstructivism), or there is a module but its development is so abnormal in Williams syndrome (WS) that no conclusion can be drawn about its normal architecture (moderate nativism). Radical nativism, which holds that WS is a case of intact syntax, is untenable. Specific Language Impairment and WS create a dilemma that radical nativism cannot accommodate.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityPhilip Gerrans-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherCambridge Univ Press-
dc.rightsCopyright © 2002 Cambridge University Press-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x02280139-
dc.titleNativism, neuroconstructivism and developmental disorder-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.provenancePublished online by Cambridge University Press 11 Aug 2003-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0140525X02280139-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidGerrans, P. [0000-0002-1755-8727]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Philosophy publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gerrans_38120.pdfPublished version55.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.