Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/45486
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Case note: Prosper the government, suffer the practitioner: The Graham Barclay oysters litigation |
Author: | Stubbs, M. |
Citation: | University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2003; 26(3):727-740 |
Publisher: | Star Printery |
Issue Date: | 2003 |
ISSN: | 0313-0096 |
Abstract: | The Australian High Court ruling on the Graham Barclays Oysters case, where oysters unfit for human consumption were said to have caused hepatitis, held the company not liable for negligence, but liable to pay for damages due to breach of Trade Practices Act. However, the Council and the State were found not liable for negligence for oyster growth in the Council lake, which leads to the courts’ difficulty in deciding on a reasonable or unreasonable conduct in the circumstances. |
Rights: | Copyright © RMIT Publishing |
Published version: | http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=118095179047637;res=IELHSS |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 6 Business School publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.