Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Generous or parsimonious cognitive architecture? Cognitive neuroscience and Theory of Mind|
|Citation:||British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2008; 59(2):121-141|
|Publisher:||Oxford Univ Press|
|Philip Gerrans and Valerie E. Stone|
|Abstract:||Recent work in cognitive neuroscience on the child's Theory of Mind (ToM) has pursued the idea that the ability to metarepresent mental states depends on a domain-specific cognitive subystem implemented in specific neural circuitry: a Theory of Mind Module. We argue that the interaction of several domain-general mechanisms and lower-level domain-specific mechanisms accounts for the flexibility and sophistication of behavior, which has been taken to be evidence for a domain-specific ToM module. This finding is of more general interest since it suggests a parsimonious cognitive architecture can account for apparent domain specificity. We argue for such an architecture in two stages. First, on conceptual grounds, contrasting the case of language with ToM, and second, by showing that recent evidence in the form of fMRI and lesion studies supports the more parsimonious hypothesis.|
|Description:||Copyright © 2008 British Society for the Philosophy of Science|
|Appears in Collections:||Philosophy publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.