Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/46762
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBuisman-Pijlman, F.en
dc.contributor.authorVan Ree, J.en
dc.date.issued2002en
dc.identifier.citationBehavioural Brain Research, 2002; 136(2):365-373en
dc.identifier.issn0166-4328en
dc.identifier.issn1872-7549en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/46762-
dc.description.abstractPhysical stress (PS) and emotional stress (ES) have opposite long-term effects on open field behaviour. PS consisted of a repeated mild foot shock treatment, which the ES animals witnessed. PS caused a long-term decrease in locomotor activity and exploration behaviours and increased immobility. ES induced an increase in locomotor activity. These changes in open field behaviour could be the result of several factors such as increased anxiety, a shift in coping strategy or simply a change in locomotor activity. To investigate the effect of the PS and ES treatment on these separate factors, the following behavioural tests were performed: defensive withdrawal, shock prod bury, large open field and social interaction. PS animals initially showed immobility in the shock prod bury test and the large open field, while the differences measured over the entire test period were small or not present. PS did not induce differences in the defensive withdrawal and the social interaction tests. ES and control animals did not differ significantly in any of the tests. The effects of PS in the shock prod bury test in particular can be interpreted as an indication of a passive coping style. However, PS animals showed the same behaviour as controls, but started displaying the behaviour after the initial immobility response. It is concluded that neither PS nor ES affects the coping style and anxiety level of the rats. PS induces a delay in behavioural responding and ES induces locomotor activation per se. It seems that the shock prod bury test is most suitable to distinguish between exploration and coping style.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityFemke T. A. Pijlman and Jan M. van Reeen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevier Science BVen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.subjectCoping style; Anxiety; Locomotor activity; Behaviour; Rodent; Stressen
dc.titlePhysical but not emotional stress induces a delay in behavioural coping responses in ratsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020081156en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00128-6en
dc.identifier.pubid43026-
pubs.library.collectionPharmacology publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidBuisman-Pijlman, F. [0000-0003-2099-6450]en
Appears in Collections:Pharmacology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.