Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/53637
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Models of chronic disease management in primary care for patients with mild-to-moderate asthma or COPD: a narrative review
Author: Cranston, J.
Crockett, A.
Moss, J.
Pegram, R.
Stocks, N.
Citation: Medical Journal of Australia, 2008; 188(8 Suppl):S50-S52
Publisher: Australasian Med Publ Co Ltd
Issue Date: 2008
ISSN: 0025-729X
1326-5377
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Josephine M. Cranston, Alan J. Crockett, John R. Moss, Robert W. Pegram and Nigel P. Stocks
Abstract: Objective: To review the literature for any promising strategies for the primary care management of mild-to-moderate asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adults. Methods: Using “MeSH” terms for COPD, asthma and primary health care, we conducted an extensive literature search for relevant meta-analyses, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, reports and individual studies. Grey literature was also included. We chose a narrative review approach because of substantial heterogeneity of study designs in the literature. Results: 1119 articles of potential relevance were retained, of which 246 were included in our review. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether general practitioners with a special interest (GPwSI) in respiratory care improved the diagnosis and management of mild-to-moderate COPD. An asthma service involving GPwSI increased respiratory drug costs but reduced the costs for less specific drugs. No clear benefit has been shown for practice nurse-run asthma clinics in primary care compared with usual care in altering asthma morbidity, quality of life, lung function or medication use. Evidence to determine the effectiveness of practice nurse-run COPD clinics could not be found. Self-management education, GP review and action plans may produce short-term benefits for asthma patients, particularly those with moderate-to-severe disease, but the evidence for a similar approach to patients with mild-to-moderate COPD is equivocal. There has been poor uptake of respiratory clinical guidelines relevant to primary care — partly because most guidelines are based on moderate-to-severe disease. Spirometry programs in primary care are useful for differential diagnosis of asthma and COPD. Spirometry may alter the management of mild asthma, but there is a lack of evidence that it alters the management of COPD in primary care. Conclusion: The role of primary health care in management of mild-to-moderate asthma and COPD requires further investigation using randomised controlled trials.
Keywords: Humans
Asthma
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Models, Theoretical
Primary Health Care
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01744.x
Published version: http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/188_08_210408/cra11057_fm.html
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
General Practice publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.