Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Global Health Promotion, 2009; 16(3):45-52||en|
|dc.description.abstract||Community-based organizations hold an increasingly central role in the representation and advocacy of marginalized groups and individuals. In these capacities, such organizations make significant contributions to the areas of health and health services. In particular, they are considered well-positioned to operationalize ‘bottom-up’ approaches to health promotion. In this article we use a case study to illuminate unforeseen consequences of government funding of community-based organizations involved in health promotion and health service work. Previous research has found that many health promotion practitioners are engaged in a shift towards ‘bottom-up’ approaches to health promotion (1). In contrast, our findings suggest that due to government funding, those best positioned to promote community participation and empowerment may be experiencing a converse shift away from ‘bottom-up’ approaches.||en|
|dc.description.statementofresponsibility||Gemma E. Carey and Annette J. Braunack-Mayer||en|
|dc.publisher||Sage Publications Ltd||en|
|dc.rights||Copyright © The Author(s) 2009||en|
|dc.subject||Humans; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Program Evaluation; Social Control Policies; Health Policy; Community Networks; Social Support; Health Promotion; Financing, Government; Organizational Case Studies; Australia; Female; Male||en|
|dc.title||Exploring the effects of government funding on community-based organizations: 'top-down' or 'bottom-up' approaches to health promotion?||en|
|pubs.library.collection||Public Health publications||en|
|dc.identifier.orcid||Braunack-Mayer, A. [0000-0003-4427-0224]||en|
|Appears in Collections:||Public Health publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.