Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Colonial judiciaries, Aboriginal protection and South Australia's policy of punishing 'with exemplary severity'|
|Citation:||Australian Historical Studies, 2010; 41(3):319-336|
|Amanda Nettlebeck and Robert Foster|
|Abstract:||The ways in which Europeans experienced the legal system for crimes against Aboriginal people needs more systematic research. Although for the first fifty years of Australian settlement Aboriginal legal status was protractedly ambiguous, the foundational principle of later-established South Australia was that Aboriginal people were British subjects and settler crimes against them would be punished 'with exemplary severity'. This paper puts this foundational principle to the test by examining the working of the legal system where Europeans were investigated for the deaths of Aboriginal people. Ultimately, we argue, the principle of protecting Aboriginal people as British subjects not only failed, but became inverted into a principle of Aboriginal punishment.|
|Keywords:||Humans; Prejudice; Punishment; Colonialism; Civil Rights; Judicial Role; Public Policy; Race Relations; History, 19th Century; History, 20th Century; Oceanic Ancestry Group; Australia; Europe|
|Rights:||Copyright status unknown|
|Appears in Collections:||History publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.