Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||The politics of affective citizenship: from Blair to Obama|
|Citation:||Citizenship Studies, 2010; 14(5):495-509|
|Abstract:||Politicians have long mobilised emotion in order to gain voters' support. However, this article argues that the politics of affect is also implicated in how citizens' identities, rights and entitlements are constructed. Examples are drawn from the positions of UK, US, Canadian and Australian politicians, including Tony Blair, David Cameron, Kevin Rudd and Barack Obama. Emotions analysed include love, fear, anxiety, empathy and hope. The article argues for the importance of a concept of 'affective citizenship' which explores (a) which intimate emotional relationships between citizens are endorsed and recognised by governments in personal life and (b) how citizens are also encouraged to feel about others and themselves in broader, more public domains. It focuses on issues of sexuality, gender, race and religion, and argues that the politics of affect has major implications for determining who has full citizenship rights. The Global Financial Crisis has also seen the development of an 'emotional regime' in which issues of economic security are increasingly influencing constructions of citizenship.|
|Keywords:||citizenship; politics; affect; sexuality/sexual orientation; race; identity|
|Rights:||© 2010 Taylor & Francis|
|Appears in Collections:||Politics publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.