Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/67267
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | For all my family's sake, I should go and find out: An Australian report on genetic counseling and testing uptake in individuals at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer |
Author: | Wakefield, C. Ratnayake, P. Meiser, B. Suthers, G. Price, M. Duffy, J. Tucker, K. |
Citation: | Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 2011; 15(6):379-385 |
Publisher: | Mary Ann Liebert Inc Publ |
Issue Date: | 2011 |
ISSN: | 1090-6576 1945-0265 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Claire E. Wakefield, Paboda Ratnayake, Bettina Meiser, Graeme Suthers, Melanie A. Price, Jessica Duffy and Kathy Tucker |
Abstract: | Context: Despite proven benefits, the uptake of genetic counseling and testing by at-risk family members of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers remains low. Aims: This study aimed to examine at-risk individuals’ reported reasons for and against familial cancer clinic (FCC) attendance and genetic testing. Methods: Thirty-nine telephone interviews were conducted with relatives of high-risk mutation carriers, 23% (n¼9) of whom had not previously attended an FCC. Interview responses were analyzed using the frameworks of Miles and Huberman. Results: The reasons most commonly reported for FCC attendance were for clarification of risk status and to gain access to testing. While disinterest in testing was one reason for FCC nonattendance, several individuals were unaware of their risk (n¼3) or their eligibility to attend an FCC (n¼2), despite being notified of their risk status through their participation in a large-scale research project. Individuals’ reasons for undergoing testing were in line with that reported elsewhere; however, concerns about discrimination and insurance were not reported in nontestees. Conclusions: Current guidelines regarding notifying individuals discovered to be at increased risk in a research, rather than clinical setting, take a largely nondirective approach. However, this study demonstrates that individuals who receive a single letter notifying them of their risk may not understand/value the information they receive. |
Keywords: | Kathleen Cuningham National Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer (kConFab) Humans Breast Neoplasms Ovarian Neoplasms Risk Assessment Genetic Counseling Mutation Genes, BRCA1 Genes, BRCA2 Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Middle Aged Australia Female Genetic Testing |
Rights: | Copyright Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. |
DOI: | 10.1089/gtmb.2010.0158 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Molecular and Biomedical Science publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.