Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/68236
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Different competing risks models applied to data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry
Author: Gillam, M.
Salter, A.
Ryan, P.
Graves, S.
Citation: Acta Orthopaedica, 2011; 82(5):513-520
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Issue Date: 2011
ISSN: 1745-3674
1745-3682
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Marianne H Gillam, Amy Salter, Philip Ryan, and Stephen E Graves
Abstract: Purpose: Here we describe some available statistical models and illustrate their use for analysis of arthroplasty registry data in the presence of the competing risk of death, when the influence of covariates on the revision rate may be different to the influence on the probability (that is, risk) of the occurrence of revision. Patients and methods: Records of 12,525 patients aged 75–84 years who had received hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of femur were obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. The covariates whose effects we investigated were: age, sex, type of prosthesis, and type of fixation (cementless or cemented). Extensions of competing risk regression models were implemented, allowing the effects of some covariates to vary with time. Results: The revision rate was significantly higher for patients with unipolar than bipolar prostheses (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.01–1.89) or with monoblock than bipolar prostheses (HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.08–1.94). It was significantly higher for the younger age group (75–79 years) than for the older one (80–84 years) (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.05–1.56) and higher for males than for females (HR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.09–1.71). The probability of revision, after correction for the competing risk of death, was only significantly higher for unipolar prostheses than for bipolar prostheses, and higher for the younger age group. The effect of fixation type varied with time; initially, there was a higher probability of revision for cementless prostheses than for cemented prostheses, which disappeared after approximately 1.5 years. Interpretation: When accounting for the competing risk of death, the covariates type of prosthesis and sex influenced the rate of revision differently to the probability of revision. We advocate the use of appropriate analysis tools in the presence of competing risks and when covariates have time-dependent effects.
Keywords: Humans; Hip Fractures; Prosthesis Failure; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Reoperation; Registries; Models, Statistical; Probability; Risk Factors; Regression Analysis; Prosthesis Design; Hip Prosthesis; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Australia; Female; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Rights: Open Access - This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
RMID: 0020113500
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2011.618918
Appears in Collections:Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_68236.pdfPublished version815.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.