Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||A re-audit of the use of definitions of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in peer-reviewed literature|
|Citation:||Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 2012; 19(8):455-456|
|Roger W. Byard, Vivian Lee|
|Abstract:||The use of different definitions of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) may make comparison of data among studies difficult. Fifty randomly selected papers dealing with SIDS that were published between 2010 and 2011 in peer-reviewed journals were reviewed to determine whether one of three internationally accepted definitions of SIDS had been either written in the text or referenced. A significant improvement in the use of definitions has occurred since 2005, with the percentage of papers either quoting or referencing a standard definition increasing by 26%, from 42 to 68%. The 1989 NICHD definition remained the most commonly used definition (35.1%) followed by the 2004 San Diego definition (26.3%). Although the percentage of papers where either no definition was provided or where an idiosyncratic or mis-cited definition was used fell 26%, from 58 to 32%, nearly one in three papers published on SIDS in peer-reviewed journals that were included in this study still did not cite a standard definition.|
|Keywords:||SIDS; Infant death; Definition; Research; Audit|
|Rights:||© 2012 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.|
|Appears in Collections:||Pathology publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.