Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/78145
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Corporate social responsibility, the business judgment rule and human rights in Australia - warm inner glow or warming the globe? |
Author: | Wilson, N. |
Citation: | Monash University Law Review, 2012; 38(3):148-167 |
Publisher: | Monash University, Faculty of Law |
Issue Date: | 2012 |
ISSN: | 0311-3140 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Nigel Wilson |
Abstract: | Corporate social responsibility ('CSR') has had a renaissance in corporate governance. CSR has been regarded more often as a commercial law concept which has been readily applied in the commercial boardroom but has received little judicial consideration in the courtroom. Recent corporate reform in Australia in relation to directors’ duties, specifically the business judgment rule, has provided a ‘safe harbour’ corporate governance framework for the exercise of directors’ duties generally, including, and perhaps unexpectedly, in relation to CSR-related activities. More broadly, the concepts which underpin CSR are also consistent with contemporary human rights developments. Importantly, CSR also has a potential role to play in relation to corporate attitudes towards climate change, provided it is supported by active decision-making by directors of both transnational corporations and small to medium enterprises. |
Rights: | Copyright © 2012 Monash University |
Published version: | http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=309272612958479;res=IELHSS |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Law publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
RA_hdl_78145.pdf Restricted Access | Restricted Access | 617.01 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.