Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/87025
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaeed, S.-
dc.contributor.authorGolfam, M.-
dc.contributor.authorBeall, R.-
dc.contributor.authorAshbury, F.-
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, L.-
dc.contributor.authorLittle, J.-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2014; 44(9):882-890-
dc.identifier.issn0014-2972-
dc.identifier.issn1365-2362-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/87025-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The burden of chronic disease is projected to assume crisis proportions in most parts of the world by the middle of the century, focusing attention on the need for preventive interventions. We identify and review published research on primary prevention individual-level interventions in current practice and describe and discuss the limitations of the current evidence. The report facilitates prioritizing a research agenda for potential interventions that might be investigated within cohort studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a rapid review. Computerized database searches (PubMed and EMBASE) were performed in October 2012 to identify articles on primary prevention interventions that are directed at the individual level. Potentially, relevant International Agency of Research on Cancer handbooks and monographs were also reviewed. The review includes articles reported in English on the efficacy or effectiveness of a preventive intervention in an adult population. It excludes articles on alcohol or tobacco smoking. RESULTS: Many chronic disease interventions directed at individuals report a protective effect in the short term and some evidence for the efficacy of chemoprevention in chronic disease prevention exists. Evidence these effects persist in the longer term is inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: There are currently only limited evidence-based preventions for most chronic diseases, for which a summary is available in Table A1 (see Appendix B). Most individual-level intervention research studies have been conducted using case-control designs and some small, randomized studies. There are fewer impediments to lifestyle modifications when compared to prevention using chemoprevention and vaccination or other methods of prevention of persistent infection.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilitySara Saeed, Mohammad Golfam, Reed F. Beall, Fredrick D. Ashbury, Lyle J. Palmer and Julian Little-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.rights© 2014 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eci.12298-
dc.subjectChronic disease-
dc.subjectindividual-level intervention-
dc.subjectintervention studies-
dc.subjectprevention-
dc.titleEffectiveness of individual-focused interventions to prevent chronic disease-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/eci.12298-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidPalmer, L. [0000-0002-1628-3055]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Translational Health Science publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.