Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Book chapter
Title: Renewable energy: urban centres lead the dance in Australia?
Author: Hamilton, C.
Kellett, J.
Citation: Renewable energy governance: complexities and challenges, 2013 / Michalena, E., Hills, J. (ed./s), pp.63-79
Publisher: Springer
Publisher Place: UK
Issue Date: 2013
Series/Report no.: Lecture Notes in Energy
ISBN: 9781447155942
Statement of
Cathryn Hamilton and Jon Kellett
Abstract: Australia provides great potential as a case study for renewable energy governance. It is a large continent with a comparatively small and highly urbanised population. It possesses enormous mineral wealth and is a major exporter of fossil fuels, but it also has huge potential for the exploitation of renewable energy. Politically, it is a country divided between those who support large-scale exploitation of fossil fuels and those who advocate that the nation should grasp the opportunity of its rich renewable resources to become a world leader in this field. The potential for renewable energy development has been recognised in some areas, with large-scale wind energy development in particular. But the great distances between energy sources and users suggest that the urban centres themselves should be examined as sources of renewable energy. Governance is complex, with three levels, Federal, State and Local, each exercising power and capable of influencing energy concerns. The key question which is addressed in this chapter is, in a regime with multiple layers of government, at what level is renewable energy development best promoted? We address the politics of energy in the context of Australia’s economy and governance arrangements. Drawing data from previous research carried out by the authors, we examine the potential of urban areas to generate and supply their own power from renewable energy. Using Hammer’s (2009) capacity to act theory we examine the capacity of local government to develop urban renewable energy. We seek to identify hesitations towards RE adoption in all levels. A critical question concerns whether bottom-up or top-down action is preferable.
Rights: © Springer-Verlag London 2013
RMID: 0020138438
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-5595-9_4
Appears in Collections:Architecture publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_87119.pdfRestricted Access260.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.