Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/87313
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Olijnyk, A. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The Sydney Law Review, 2013; 35(4):761-780 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0082-0512 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1444-9528 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/87313 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In 2011, the High Court handed down judgments in two cases that raised a similar issue: the risk that an interlocutory judgment can create an appearance of bias on the pan of a judge. This issue highlights the tension between, on the one hand, the principle that judges must be, and appear to be, impartial; and, on the other, the changes to the judicial role brought about by the demands of efficiency. This article uses the two cases as a basis for examining the way in which the bias rule currently operates in relation to interlocutory judgments. It concludes that the current approach places undue emphasis on a risk of prejudgment of specific matters, and advocates a widening of locus in the application of the test for apprehended bias. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Anna Olijnyk | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Faculty of Law, University of Sydney | - |
dc.rights | COPYRIGHT 2013 Sydney Law School | - |
dc.source.uri | http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA357261764&v=2.1&u=adelaide&it=r&p=AONE&sw=w&asid=0023346eff4653f4588a1be7d2dda902 | - |
dc.subject | interlocutory judgement | - |
dc.subject | High Court | - |
dc.subject | Judge impartial | - |
dc.subject | bias | - |
dc.title | Apprehended bias and interlocutory judgments | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Olijnyk, A. [0000-0003-0140-7657] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 2 Law publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
RA_hdl_87313.pdf Restricted Access | Restricted Access | 4.58 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.